Article preview
- Abstract
- Section snippets
- References (26)
- Cited by (225)
- Recommended articles (6)
Journal of World Business
Volume 47, Issue 4,
October 2012
, Pages 504-518
Author links open overlay panel, , , ,
Abstract
Since its inception in the early 1990s, the Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) project has investigated the complex relationship between societal culture and organizational behavior. The focus of this paper is on leadership, specifically what we know and have learned from the GLOBE project so far. Among other findings, we demonstrate that national culture indirectly influences leadership behaviors through the leadership expectations of societies. In other words, executives tend to lead in a manner more or less consistent with the leadership prototypes endorsed within their particular culture. In turn, leaders who behave according to expectations are most effective. We also found that some leadership behaviors are universally effective such as charismatic/value-based leadership; others are much more culturally sensitive such as participative leadership. Finally, we identified truly superior (and also truly inferior) CEOs by the degree to which their behaviors exceed (or fail to meet) their society's expectations. All in all, understanding national culture gives us a heads-up as to which kinds of leadership will likely be enacted and effective in each society. We believe that the GLOBE journey has helped us understand the complex, tricky, and fascinating relationships among societal culture, organizational behavior, and leadership processes.
Section snippets
Objectives and findings of GLOBE phases 1 and 2: measuring societal culture and developing a culturally endorsed theory of leadership
In this section of the paper, we present the major findings of GLOBE research with respect to our major leadership theory which we have labeled as the culturally endorsed theory of leadership (CLT). The acronym CLT also stands for the specific leadership attributes (e.g., honesty) and their organization as part of 21 primary and 6 global leadership dimensions. For instance, charismatic visionary leadership is a primary dimension which is part of the global charismatic/value based leadership
Objectives and findings of GLOBE phase 3: CEO leadership behavior and effectiveness
GLOBE phase 3 has just been completed; it started approximately in 2000 and data analysis continues to this day. We surveyed and interviewed 1060 CEOs and surveyed their over 5000 direct reports in 24 countries (Dorfman et al., 2010, Sully de Luque et al., 2011). Our goal was to examine the relationship between national culture, culturally endorsed leadership theory (CLT), leadership behavior, and leadership effectiveness. In the previous phases, we examined the impact of national culture on
What we still need to know – future globe research studies
The GLOBE project started with a research design that included four phases. We have completed the third phase and it is time to step back and contemplate future GLOBE studies. The purpose of the proposed fourth GLOBE phase was to further validate hypotheses in the original GLOBE model by conducting laboratory and field studies (House et al., 2004, p. 18). This fourth phase could include field studies of leadership development based on previous GLOBE findings. It could also explore a set of
References (26)
- M. Dasborough et al.
Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader–member relationships
See AlsoDimensions of Cultural Difference and Their EffectTHE GLOBE BOOK OF IN-DEPTH STUDIES OF 25 SOCIETIES. – The Journal of Applied Christian LeadershipLeadership Quarterly
(2002)
- H. Kabasakal et al.
Leadership and cultures around the world: Findings from GLOBE
Journal of World Business
(2002)
- I. Wanasika et al.
Managerial leadership and culture in Sub-Saharan Africa
Journal of World Business
(2011)
- G. Yukl
How leaders influence organizational effectiveness
Leadership Quarterly
(2008)
- B.M. Bass
Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries?
American Psychologist
(1997)
- S. Beechler et al.
Leading with a global mindset
- W. Churchill
The Russian enigma
(1939)
- P. Dorfman et al.
Leadership and cultural variation: The identification of culturally endorsed leadership profiles
- P. Dorfman et al.
Strategic leadership across cultures: The new GLOBE multinational study
Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards
(2009)
Regional and climate clustering of societal cultures
Culture and leadership: A connectionist information processing model
Cited by (225)
Multidimensional cultural distance and self-employment of internal migrants in China
2023, International Review of Economics and Finance
This research examines the roles of multidimensional cultural distance including both value and practice on supporting urbanization, focusing on self-employment of internal migrants in China. Prior to examining the effect of cultural distance, we confirm that self-employment is the dominant choice for urban migrants. Building on Hofstede's theory, we calculating the Kogut and Singh Index of cultural values and cultural practices based on survey data set of World Values. After combining these two indices with China Migrants Dynamic Survey data to construct a comprehensive cross-sectional dataset of 521,166 observational samples from 2010 to 2016, we show that both cultural value distance and cultural practice distance have a negative effect on self-employment of internal migrants in China. According to the theory of labor market segmentation, our results reveal that cultural distance is strongly negative associated with the likelihood for internal migrants to engage in self-employment both for opportunity purpose and necessary purpose. From heterogeneity analysis, negative effects of cultural distances exist in the service industry, manufacturing industry, and the Yangtze River Delta. Further discussion shows that cultural value distance also has an indirect influence on individual behavior through cultural practice. Our results suggest that cultural distance prevents migrants from integrating into the local labor market in the form of self-employment.
(Video) Extraordinary: The Revelations (Full Documentary)Transformational versus transactional leadership styles and project success: A meta-analytic review
2023, European Management Journal
Despite the fact that the reliance on project teams and project-based organizations has significantly increased over the past decades, previous meta-analyses paid no attention to the examination of leadership styles in the context of projects. The purpose of this study was to meta-analytically synthesize and investigate the contradictory evidence on the effects of transformational leadership and transactional leadership on project success. The study also examined several project-level and country-level moderators in such effects. The study used 64 effect sizes from 41 primary studies on projects to examine the proposed relationships. The findings suggested that transformational leadership had a stronger effect on project success than transactional leadership. The results further indicated that project-level factors (i.e., project size and project type) moderated the relationships of leadership styles with project success. Moreover, the country-level factors (i.e., power distance, collectivism, and economic status of the country) also moderated some of the relationships. Theoretical and practical implications are provided in the end.
A meta-analytic synthesis of how market and entrepreneurial orientation contribute to export performance: Do home country institutions matter?
2023, Industrial Marketing Management
Citation Excerpt :
The fundamental objective of the GLOBE project is to shed light on the interplay between culture and leadership in different parts of the world (House, Javidan, Hanges, & Dorfman, 2002). Within the scope of this project, cultural attributes of society are classified into nine cultural dimensions (i.e., uncertainty avoidance, power distance, institutional collectivism, in-group collectivism, gender egalitarianism, assertiveness, future orientation, performance orientation, and humane orientation) (Dorfman, Javidan, Hanges, Dastmalchian, & House, 2012; House et al., 2004). In this meta-analytic investigation, the GLOBE project has been extensively utilized by researchers addressing the implications of national culture in international marketing and management literature (e.g., Mueller, Rosenbusch, & Bausch, 2013; Tang & Buckley, 2020), providing a foundation for assessing informal institutions.
Although the related streams of research have witnessed a burgeoning interest in recent decades, empirical evidence on how strategic orientations are relevant to export performance remains inconclusive. Therefore, this research aims to review and quantitatively synthesize the existing literature on the relationship between strategic orientations and export performance by investigating the moderating effects of home country institutions and measurement factors. Meta-analyzing 42 empirical articles containing 11,518 firms with 185 effect sizes, this study provides strong support for the favorable effects of both market and entrepreneurial orientation on the multiple facets of export performance. Besides, the meta-analysis has uncovered that the magnitude of the correlation between market orientation and export performance is contingent upon the uncertainty avoidance dimension of national culture; but not upon the formal institutions in the home country. Further, the association between entrepreneurial orientation and export performance has been found to be moderated by formal as well as informal institutions of the home country. Significant variations in the influences of market and entrepreneurial orientation on export performance have also been spotted depending on measurement factors, particularly upon objective and subjective measures for assessing export performance and the dimensional nature of the strategic orientation scales.
When the Minority Rules: Leveraging Difference While Facilitating Congruence for Cultural Minority Senior Leaders
2022, Journal of International Management
The inclusion of cultural minorities as senior leaders is of growing importance and relevance to contemporary organizations with increasingly international composition, but much is to be learned about how and when such leaders impact the workplaces they lead. We draw on the “cultural difference” and “cultural congruence” propositions (Dorfman and House, 2004) to build a model for understanding whether and under what conditions cultural minority senior leaders have an impact on the elaboration of task-relevant information and relationship conflict in their workplaces. Hierarchical regression results from a study of 315 Australian workplaces and their senior leaders suggest that, regardless of whether the senior leader is a member of a cultural minority group, an organizational climate for innovation and flexibility increases information elaboration – an effect that is stronger when the organization faces greater environmental turbulence. The results further provide support for a three-way interaction effect, whereby employees in workplaces led by a cultural minority leader have less relationship conflict when climate for innovation and environmental turbulence are both low. We conclude with a discussion of the scholarly contributions and practical implications of our conceptual and empirical work, the limitations of our study, and future directions for this research.
Where business networks and institutions meet: Internationalization decision-making under uncertainty
2022, Journal of International Management
Both business networks and institutional forces are relevant to firm internationalization but they have seldom been studied together. We investigate under what circumstances firms are more likely to adopt non-predictive strategy in light of the influence of the business networks, the institutional forces, and the home market background affecting their internationalization. Based on survey data from 758 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from Brazil, China, Poland, Italy, and Sweden, our results support the effects of formal institutional distance and cultural differences on the use of non-predictive strategies by SMEs in internationalization decisions, as well as the contingency effects of business network stability and of having an emerging market background. We integrate research on the liability of foreignness and the liability of outsidership and find that business network stability is critical. It does not moderate the relation between cultural difference and NPS adoption but attenuates the negative relation between institutional distance and NPS adoption, indicating that the liabilities of foreignness and outsidership play different roles in internationalization.
(Video) Top 100 TV Shows Of All TimeCognitive diversity and team creativity: Effects of demographic faultlines, subgroup imbalance and information elaboration
2022, Journal of Business Research
Confusion in previous studies over how and when cognitive diversity results in higher or lower performance has led to an examination of the influence of a range of moderator variables. Our study provides new theoretical insights into this field of research by extending the categorization–elaboration model (CEM) through an examination of the interaction effects of multiple convergent demographic diversities on information elaboration, team processes and creativity. Based on comparative fit and an in-group projection model of social categorization theory, the moderating influence of demographic faultlines and subgroup imbalance are also investigated. Using hierarchical regression analysis (HRA), empirical support from 453 team members nested within 91 teams across five organizations was found for the mediating role of team information elaboration on the relationship between cognitive diversity and team creativity. Furthermore, both demographic faultlines and subgroup balance were found to moderate the relationship between cognitive diversity and team information elaboration. Our study provides additional clarity concerning processes underlying the positive effects of cognitive diversity on team performance.
Recommended articles (6)
Research article
U.S. corporations are from Mars, Chinese corporations are from Venus
Business Horizons, Volume 65, Issue 4, 2022, pp. 505-517
Relations between U.S. and Chinese corporations are increasingly strained. In this article, we examine how differences in the key domains of corporate governance, underlying corporate philosophy, innovation, and dispute resolution contribute to this strained relationship. We illustrate these differences by examining the relations between Skyworks Solutions (U.S.) and ZTE (China). We discuss the three broad strategies available to U.S. managers in engaging with Chinese corporations, depending on the extent of their involvement and comfort with discord: (1) playing ball, (2) straddling the middle ground, and (3) decoupling.
Research article
A Dual Model of Leadership and Hierarchy: Evolutionary Synthesis
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 23, Issue 11, 2019, pp. 952-967
From the popularity of authoritarian political leaders to the under-representation of women in boardrooms, leadership is an important theme in current human social affairs. Leadership is also a prominent research topic in the biological, social, and cognitive sciences. However, these active literatures have evolved somewhat independently and there is a need for synthesis. Acomparative-evolutionary approach can integrate seemingly divergent perspectives by making a distinction between two leadership styles, prestige and dominance, that have contrasting expressions, functions, histories, and neural and developmental pathways. The distinction may help to resolve various scientific puzzles, such as: (i) opposing views on the different functions and expressions of leadership; (ii) the appeal of dominance-style leaders; and (iii) sex biases in leadership emergence in modern society.
Research article
Supervisor's HEXACO personality traits and subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision
The Leadership Quarterly, Volume 28, Issue 5, 2017, pp. 691-700
(Video) 445,000 Years Ago, THEY visited Earth, They TOOK the gold, Gave Us Nephilim, Kingdoms of SumeriaAbusive supervision is detrimental to both subordinates and organizations. Knowledge about individual differences in personality related to abusive supervision may improve personnel selection and potentially reduce the harmful effects of this type of leadership. Using the HEXACO personality framework, we hypothesized that subordinates perceive leaders high on Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility as less abusive. In a sample of 107 unique supervisor-subordinate dyads that filled out the online questionnaire, we found that both Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility were negatively related to subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision. Our findings contribute to our understanding of the origins of abusive supervision and hopefully stimulate future research on supervisor personality and abusive supervision.
Research article
The triad model of follower needs: theory and review
Current Opinion in Psychology, Volume 33, 2020, pp. 142-147
Humans have an evolved flexible followership psychology that enables them to select different leaders in different contexts, depending on their needs. We distinguish a triad of follower needs: (i) guidance into a shared direction, (ii) active protection against threats, and (iii) judicious dispute settlement. These needs relate to critical group coordination challenges described in biology and anthropology and to different evolutionary leadership theories. We describe the contexts, in which these needs emerge, the characteristics of leaders who meet these needs, and the potential risks of following these leaders. We end by discussing the potential of our theory to aid the understanding of leadership in modern organizations, female leadership, leader manipulation of needs, and individual differences between followers.
Research article
Four GLOBE dimensions of perceived social norms in 33 countries
Learning and Individual Differences, Volume 41, 2015, pp. 30-42
In this article we report on an attempt to replicate the findings from the GLOBE (House et al., 2004) study that utilized measures of perceived social norms. This study was based on N=6938 participants from 33 countries. Four out of nine original dimensions were identified: Humane Orientation, Uncertainty Avoidance/Future Orientation, Power Distance and Gender (Non)Egalitarianism. At the country level, these factors correlated reasonably well with the original GLOBE scales. We report profiles of means for all countries and for nine world regions. For the four perceived social norms, the percentage of total variance — i.e., effect size based on eta-squared statistics and hierarchical linear modelling decompositions — attributable to cross-cultural differences is .20. This effect size is larger than those reported for measures of personality traits and values (Stankov, 2011).
Research article
Cultural Constraints on the Emergence of Women Leaders: How Global Leaders Can Promote Women in Different Cultures
Organizational Dynamics, Volume 42, Issue 3, 2013, pp. 191-197
- 1
Posthumous.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
FAQs
What findings did the Globe research group indicate about leadership and culture? ›
The GLOBE project was significant in indicating how cultures perceive effective and ineffective leadership, which is helpful to leaders in facilitating intercultural interactions.
What was the main purpose of the Globe project? ›The Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) project is a research that offers international management strategies. It was developed to ensure managers can develop, assess and evaluate how effective leadership theories are in organizations.
What is the Globe study of leadership? ›The Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Research Program (GLOBE) As the name of the study suggests, GLOBE focuses on leadership. More specifically, it is a cross-cultural, global study that examined organizational leadership's effectiveness across multiple societies, cultures, and countries.
What are the Globe 6 leadership styles? ›The GLOBE study provides scores on six CLT dimensions—charismatic/value-based/performance-based, team-oriented, humane-oriented, participative, autonomous, and self-protective.
What is the GLOBE theory of culture? ›GLOBE is a multi-phase, multi-method project in which investigators spanning the world are examining the interrelationships between societal culture, organizational culture, and organizational leadership.
What was the goal of the GLOBE Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Study? ›The study's purpose, as the name implies, was to better understand leadership and organizational effectiveness from a global perspective. To that end, the researchers developed attributes, dimensions, and measurement standards.
What are the main two points on the globe? ›The north and south poles are the two imaginary points where the axis would enter and exit from the earth if the axis were a pole or a line (see Fig. 1.9). The equatoris the imaginary primary reference line drawn around the earth halfway between the north and south poles.
What is the main feature of globe? ›Answer : It is mounted on an axis, on which it can rotate freely. The oceans and continents are represented over the surface of the globe with different colors. The horizontal and vertical lines are drawn over the globe, in order to find the exact location of a place.
Why is the globe so important? ›The Globe, which opened in 1599, became the playhouse where audiences first saw some of Shakespeare's best-known plays. In 1613, it burned to the ground when the roof caught fire during a performance of Shakespeare's Henry VIII. A new, second Globe was quickly built on the same site, opening in 1614.
What is global leadership and why is it important? ›Global leaders supervise employees who are of different nationalities. Global leaders develop a strategic business plan on a worldwide basis for their unit. Global leaders manage a budget on a worldwide basis for their unit. Global leaders negotiate in other countries or with people from other countries.
Why is it important to study global leadership? ›
For the business world, global leadership will make the difference between growth or losing ground to companies better equipped for the international landscape. This extends past the ability to navigate the obstacles of foreign business environments to a company's success in using talent from around the world.
What are the 3 main leadership styles? ›And each successful leader develops a style based on their own personality, goals, and business culture based on one of these three leadership styles: autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire. Take a moment and consider your own leadership approach.
What is culture and leadership? ›Leadership culture is how leaders interact with one another and their team members. It's the way leaders operate, communicate, and make decisions. And it's about the everyday working environment: their behaviors, interactions, beliefs, and values.
What are the benefits of GLOBE study? ›GLOBE studies provide a classification of cultural dimensions that is more expansive than the commonly used Hofstede classification system. GLOBE studies provide useful information about what is universally accepted as good and bad leadership.
What are the keys to effective global leadership? ›They need to speak well, be charismatic, deliver a compelling message, and command an audience that spark the interests of others. Effective global leaders learn to overcome geographic, culture and language barriers and adapt their communication skills accordingly.
What are two positive factors required for success in global leadership? ›Soft skills include attitude, self-management capabilities, and the ability to empathize and build relationships. They are the ingredients for effective global leadership.
What is the brief explanation of a globe? ›A globe is a three-dimensional scale model of the Earth or other round body. Because it is spherical, or ball-shaped, it can represent surface features, directions, and distances more accurately than a flat map.
What are the 7 parts of the globe? ›- Equator.
- Prime meridian.
- Latitude.
- Longitude.
- Northern Hemisphere.
- Southern hemisphere.
- Western Hemisphere.
- Eastern hemisphere. Get Started.
A map provides 2-D (two-dimensional presentation) of the world or its parts. Conversely, the globe provides 3-D (three-dimensional presentation) of the entire world. The latitudes and longitudes are depicted as circles or semi-circles.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of globe? ›Advantages : It is the most accurate three dimensional representation of the earth. It shows the distribution of continents and oceans accurately. Lines of latitude and longitude are marked on a globe. Disadvantages :Only a part of the earth can be seen on a globe at one glance.
What is the biggest advantage of a globe? ›
GLOBES – A globe is the most accurate way of showing the Earth's surface. It is a scale model of the Earth, showing actual shapes, relative sizes, and locations of landmasses and bodies of water. A globe also provides accurate information about distances and directions between two points.
What are the five advantages of globe? ›- Global is a three dimensional spherical model of planet earth. ...
- It shows the exact shape of the earth that is slightly spherical, flattened at the poles, and bulges at the equator.
- The physical features are more accurately shown. ...
- It provides the idea of the tilt of Earth's axis.
In 1971 Wanamaker set up the Shakespeare's Globe Trust to actively pursue his long-term dream of building a reconstruction of the original Globe theatre. It took 23 years to find land, get planning permission and raise the money for the work.
What are the roles and responsibilities of a global leader? ›They're responsible for creating the right settings for their employees to grow and develop, and to motivate them to do so. Global leaders are in charge of the development of their employees, so that they, in turn, can do a better job and achieve their goals.
How do you build a strong leadership culture? ›- #1: Focus on People's Strengths. ...
- #2: Know When (and When NOT) to Seek Consensus. ...
- #3: Make Accountability a Core Value. ...
- #4: Commit Resources to Leadership Development. ...
- #5: Declare your Core Values to be Non-Negotiable.
- Step 1: Engage the CEO.
- Step 2: Identify the Desired Business Outcomes and the Leadership Capabilities to Deliver them.
- Step 3: Engage the teams with the Culture of Excellence Process.
- Step 4: Create and Implement the Measurable Results Sustainment Plan.
- Step 5: Measure the Business Impact and Performance.
- Pay attention to leadership trends. ...
- Align with business strategy. ...
- Choose the right modality. ...
- Tailor programs to the individual. ...
- Include coaching opportunities. ...
- Evaluate the program. ...
- Don't overlook those who are ripe for advancement.
Effective leaders are competent, skilled, secure, and considerate. These leaders find time for everyone; they are genuine and authentic in their communications and actions.
What is the best leadership style? ›The democratic leadership style is one of the most effective because it encourages everyone to participate in all processes, share their opinions, and know that you will hear them. It also encourages employees to be engaged because they know you will hear their feedback.
How do you answer what kind of leader are you? ›Come Up With Examples of Your Leadership Style in Action
Provide specific answers when talking about what kind of leader you are. Vague responses provide nothing to work with and don't accurately depict what you can do when leading a team. Interviewers want to hear about your leadership style in action!
What are the five C's of leadership? ›
The five C's encompass the key traits that are considered the bedrock of effective leadership, including credibility, communication, commitment, confidence and creativity.
What are 5 behaviors good leaders demonstrate? ›The authors discovered that when leaders experience their personal best, they display five core practices: they Model the Way, Inspire a Shared Vision, Challenge the Process, Enable Others to Act, and Encourage the Heart. Jim and Barry called these behaviors The Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership®.
What makes a strategic leader? ›Key traits of an effective strategic leader include loyalty to the organization's vision, judicious use of power, transparency, effective communication, problem-solving, readiness to delegate, passion for their job, compassion, and empathy for others and self-awareness.
What is positive leadership style? ›Positive leadership involves experiencing, modeling, and purposefully enhancing positive emotions. A positive leader is interested in his or her employees' development as well as the bottom line. High self-awareness, optimism, and personal integrity (Avolio & Gardner, 2005).
How can a leader motivate others? ›- Share a common vision and purpose. ...
- Set clear goals and expectations. ...
- Encourage employee self-development. ...
- Provide opportunities for collaboration. ...
- Foster healthy workplaces. ...
- Give positive feedback and reward hard work. ...
- Communicate effectively with employees.
- Communication skills.
- Empathy.
- Delegation.
- Flexibility.
- Teamwork skills.
- Problem-solving skills.
- Leadership skills.
The GLOBE Project (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Project) is a study of cross-cultural leadership that spans over 60 countries and cultures. The project was founded in 1993 by Robert J. House to analyze the organizational norms, values, and beliefs of leaders in different societies.
What are the leadership dimension identified by the GLOBE project? ›The only two cultural dimensions unique to the GLOBE project are performance orientation (degree to which societies emphasize performance and achievement) and humane orientation (extent to which societies places importance on fairness, altruism, and caring).
What is one of the main findings of trait theories of leadership? ›The trait theory of leadership suggests that certain inborn or innate qualities and characteristics make someone a leader. These qualities might be personality factors, physical factors, intelligence factors, and so on.
Who researched culture and leadership resulting in the GLOBE research program? ›Background: The "Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness" (GLOBE) Research Program was conceived in 1991 by Robert J. House of the Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania.
What are the three elements of leadership effectiveness? ›
- Integrity.
- Capability.
- Passion.
When an international company has a unified team, they are better able to quickly and effectively expand. A strong international team also contributes to productivity and profit. If a company has strong global leaders, they are better able to grow and unify the company.
What is effective Global Leadership requires a global mindset? ›In short, a global leadership mindset is the ability to take a global rather than country-specific view of business and people, and be able to apply this perspective to a country, taking into account its culture.
What are the 5 dimensions of responsible leadership? ›The five key Responsible Leadership characteristics: Ethics, Honesty, Authenticity, Being a source of inspiration, and Humility — Edition 166. Today, companies face major challenges in how they should conduct their business.
What is the meaning of leadership dimensions? ›The four dimensions of leadership are an interdependent set of competencies, skills, and characteristics that enable leaders to bring people together; to get them to work together effectively; to align them around a common purpose, goals, and objectives; to get them to co-operate and rely on each other; and to trust ...
What are the four factors of leadership? ›There are four factors to transformational leadership, (also known as the "four I's"): idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individual consideration. Each factor will be discussed to help managers use this approach in the workplace.
What are the 4 leadership theories? ›Trait theories. Behavioral theories. Contingency theories. Power and influence theories.
What are some of the basic skills needed by leaders? ›- Relationship building.
- Agility and adaptability.
- Innovation and creativity.
- Employee motivation.
- Decision-making.
- Conflict management.
- Negotiation.
- Critical Thinking.